Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: richardsur Date: Apr 14, 2006 4:45am
Forum: movies Subject: Re: Automatic generation of real player (rm) files?

1) The main reason there are few Real files in the archive is that, as far as I am aware, there are no free, command-line based programs available for Linux to generate such files. All the other formats can be derived using freely available tools. Since Real Networks has chosen to keep the formats proprietary and closed, there are few options to generate Real files and the format will continue to decline in popularity.

2) VideoLAN does stream MP4 files correctly. Instead of copying and pasting the "Stream - 256Kb MPEG4" link, try using the "Download - 256Kb MPEG4" link. I know it may be counterintuitive, but it works.

3) MPlayer is not that confusing to download. On the Download page, click on any of the links to the right of "Windows releases" and download the listed .ZIP file. Or, just try this link:

4) If you absolutely must use Real Player, use the same "Download - 256Kb MPEG4" link that works with VideoLAN. Copy and paste it into the dialog box that opens when you click on File > Open. Recent versions of Real Player have full support for playback of MP4 files.

Real is an obsolete format and is dying. I would really recommend trying MP4 or XviD. You may be surprised how good the quality is.

This post was modified by richardsur on 2006-04-14 11:45:44

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: JeffT Date: Apr 14, 2006 6:26am
Forum: movies Subject: Re: Automatic generation of real player (rm) files?

1) VideoLan: I tried the "Download - 256Kb MPEG4" link as you suggested. I got it to open a video window, but it still didn't stream correctly. The application was stuck on the first image even though the time counter increased. Yes, I think it is very counterintuitive, that to "stream" one has to use the download link. What is the stream link for, if not streaming?

2) MPlayer: I downloaded the version at link you suggest. It is a command line-only application which requires reading on-line documentation to figure out how to use.

3) Compare the user experience of the above two applications to Real Player. The above two applications either require cutting and pasting a counterintuitive URL (and even then it didn't work) or looking up commands in an on-line manual and entering them into a shell. With the Real Player client, the user just clicks on the stream link and viola: the stream starts.

4) I think this points out a major problem that needs to be addressed by The problem is, that when a user clicks on the "help" link next to the word "stream", the FAQ that is opened:
Says that Real Player is used to view streaming content and that quicktime is required for mp4 streaming. But, by default, there are no real player files generated for newly uploaded content. And the free version of Quicktime cannot display in full screen mode. Thus, there is no way for a user to view streamed content in full screen just using the information at the website. Free applications that can play mp4 content in full screen mode (such as VideoLan and MPlayer) are not mentioned in the FAQ. And even if they were mentioned, without some detailed directions they are not easy to get working.
To solve this, one solution would be to provide Real Video versions of the content. That way the available content format would match what is in help link, and it allows full screen streaming.

5) I don't know if Real is an obsolete format. I do know that it's still actively used at some major sites. For example:, and and for webcasts at UC-Berkeley.

6) My main desire is that video content I upload be easy to view in full screen mode for general users. Right now (with only mp4 streaming) that's not the case.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Madhavananda Date: Apr 16, 2006 9:33am
Forum: movies Subject: Re: Automatic generation of real player (rm) files?

1. A 320x240 ratio 256kbps MP4 file looks, in most cases, absolutely horrible in full screen. Does it not?

2. You can of course generate RM files and upload them yourself. Looks like you did just that?

2b. Perhaps Real would be interested in licensing a free tool for Archive to process files into RM format to extend the lifespan of their format?

3. ...a major problem that needs to be addressed by -> If only this was the major problem in the FAQ...

This post was modified by Madhavananda on 2006-04-16 16:33:39